Petition und Campaign „Justice in the case of Peter McBride“
Press
statement regarding the stationing in Germany of the two murderers
of
Irishman Peter McBride
26.03.2001
Ladies and Gentlemen,
I am addressing you as spokesperson for the Irish solidarity groups in Germany on the issue of the Irishman Peter McBride. Since last December we have been in contact with the German Defence Ministry and in the meantime the Foreign Ministry regarding the stationing of two criminals in the Rhine Army who had been sentenced to life in prison for murder.
The German
Ministry of Defence has confirmed in a written reply dated 31st
January that the two soldiers, Mark Wright and James Fischer, are stationed in
Germany ,, and that they had requested the Foreign Ministry to “examine with
regard to the protection of human rights in Europe whether, and if necessary, which diplomatic measures are appropriate”.
The
Ministry of Defence has every reason to be concerned.
This really is an issue of two soldiers who shot down in cold blood a
young Irishman whilst on patrol in Belfast. This poses the question of how
seriously the armies in Europe are fighting racism amongst their ranks. The refusal of the British Army to discharge the
soldiers and also their stationing in Germany is outrageous in view of the
present efforts by the German government to combat the spread of radical
right-wing ideas in the German army and racist motivated violence in our
country.
An outline of the
facts
·
In 1992 two
British Army soldiers patrolling the New Lodge area of Belfast killed a young,
unarmed Irishman who they had searched just a few minutes beforehand. Due to
their daily control at that checkpoint Peter’s name and address were known
to the soldiers. Despite knowing that he was unarmed they shot him in the
back. A civil court sentenced the two soldiers due to the lack of mitigating
circumstances to life in prison for murder.
·
The result of
a campaign by part of the British Army and the British press led to the
release of the two soldiers on probation after serving three years of
their sentence in September 1998 by the then Northern Ireland Minister.
Since then the
British Army has been trying to play down the killing by saying that it took
place “under special circumstances”. This complies with the requirements
of their own guidelines which protect offenders from dishonourable discharge.
Jean McBride has been fighting with the support of the Pat Finucane Human
Rights Centre in Derry against attempts by the British Army to retrospectively
legitimise the murder of her son.
Up to now the
McBride family has won all the civil court proceedings. On the application of
the McBride family the “special circumstances” on which the army council
based their first decision was rejected by the Belfast High Court in 1999. The
army had argued that the action was not carried out with intent to kill. This
was a clear attempt to get a de facto revision of the civil court’s
judgement which hadn’t recognised any mitigating circumstances. The army was
instructed by the court to have their decision re-examined by a different army
commission.. The army did not consider this a reason to revise their decision.
In November 2000 they renewed their decision to maintain both soldiers in the
army. Again the application of the McBride family for a legal clarification of
this decision before the Belfast High Court has been permitted. The hearing is
to take place before the Belfast High Court at the end of March.
The activities of
the British Army in this case brings to light what can only be only be
interpreted as anti-Irish racism. In the last ten years more than two thousand
soldiers have been discharged for, in part, minor offences. For that reason it
is difficult to understand why the British Army is going to such extreme
lengths on behalf of these two who have been convicted of the crime of murder.
In the meanwhile
protests against this outrage have become international. The Foreign Minister
of the Irish Republic, Brian Cowen, has also condemned in sharp tones at a
sitting of the Irish parliament, Dáil Eireann, the decision of the British
Army council. He also assured the McBride family of his complete support.
In crass contrast
to the position of the Irish minister the British Army is showing absolutely
no indication whatsoever of either a reassessment or, even less, a
condemnation of the deed. The contrary is in fact taking place. On the last
anniversary of the murder the Pat Finucane Centre in Derry received a postcard
with the cynical remarks, “Merry Christmas from all ranks”. The postcard
originated from members of the Scots Guards the previous regiment of the two
soldiers now stationed in Kenya.
The attitude of
the British Army shows a frightening continuity. One of the members of the army council who was involved in
making the decision regarding the two soldiers was General Mike Jackson.
In 1972 Mike Jackson was adjutant on “Bloody Sunday” to the British
Army commander, General Wilford. That was the Sunday in January 1972 in which
14 unarmed participants in a civil rights demonstration were shot down in cold
blood by British soldiers. Shortly afterwards in order to exonerate the
soldiers the victims were declared to be the perpetrators. Since March last
year one of the most comprehensive and most expensive investigations in
British legal history has been examining the blame of the British Army in this
massacre. It is known today that officers at the time reformulated the
statements of their subordinates in order to cover up the crime.
In their response
from March 2nd the
(German) Foreign Ministry has refused to get involved in anyway in the issue
because of the forthcoming court proceedings and because of the absence of
possibilities for litigation.
We draw attention
to the fact that the forthcoming court proceedings at the end of March will
not be considering a re-evaluation of the case. What the court will be
investigating is the validity of the argument that the British Army has
violated existing British law.
We demand that
the (German) Foreign Ministry takes a clear position against the abuse of
human rights, in particular because it concerns the issue of human rights
within Europe.
With the
discussion about radical rightwing violence in this country in mind a false
impression with regard to tolerance of racial hatred and violence should be
avoid by the authorities.
We request that
you report about this case, and, that you support our protest, and also, that
you publish the enclosed statement.
We are at your
disposal for any requests for further information which you might have.