Irish News, 17. September 2001
These
children are not barter
PLATFORM
By Gerry Kelly
Sinn Fein
Since the start of the new school term the entire globe has watched a single
image of Belfast. In every corner of the world, translated into every language,
people witnessed what can only be described as one of the most frightening and
depressing episodes of the last 30 years.
School girls between the ages of four and 11 and their parents were physically
and verbally assaulted, and made to run a gauntlet of sectarian hatred and
violence. Stones, bottles, curses, whistles, air horns and a blast bomb were the
ammunition.
The objective? To harass, intimidate, injure and, in the case of the UDA, kill
Catholic school children and their parents. And if anyone was in any doubt about
this, the UDA, acting under the name of the Red Hand Defenders, issued death
threats.
After two weeks of sectarian hatred and violence on the Ardoyne Road, much of it
orchestrated by loyalist paramilitaries and defended by some within the unionist
political establishment, we have been promised that this morning the blockade
will continue. Once again Catholic children have to run a gauntlet of bigotry in
an attempt to access their school.
None of what is happening on the Ardoyne Road is very complicated. It doesn’t
take long sociological or economic explanations. It is not a puzzle looking to
be solved. It is a clear and simple case of sectarianism in its rawest and most
unpalatable form.
The blockade against the children is legally, politically, and ethically wrong.
There is no argument which can be used to justify it, and no explanation which
can be sought to underpin it. Protesting against school children and their
parents is wrong.
If all politicians recognised this, then they should call on the blockade to
end. Anything short of that lets the bigots off the hook and provides them with
political cover for their attacks on young children. This is a matter of
protecting the human and civil rights of children. Such rights are paramount.
This blockade began at the end of the last school term. Following a week in
which the parents and their children were prevented from entering their school
through the front door by loyalists and the RUC, an
11-week summer holiday period ensued. During this time a number of different
channels were opened up between the nationalist and loyalist communities in an
attempt to resolve the dispute.
Parents engaged with loyalist residents through the Mediation Network for seven
weeks. Cross-community contact was initiated between community workers from
Ardoyne and residents in Glenbryn. Sinn Fein used our contacts in the loyalist
community for five weeks in an attempt to produce some resolution.
In the end, all of these efforts failed, although not for lack of sincerity or
accommodation on the nationalist and republican side.
Nonetheless, despite the constant failure of discussions to produce a solution,
and despite a series of attacks on the children and parents in Ardoyne, all
sections of the nationalist community haveput on record their willingness to
enter into dialogue as a matter of urgency. Community leaders, parents,
political representatives and ordinary residents are all saying the same thing
– dialogue is the only way forward to end the blockade and must resume sooner
rather than later.
Many unionist politicians have sought to justify the blockade by referring to
the levels of deprivation, social exclusion and marginalisation in Glenbryn.
This, coupled with allegations of a continuous assault by republicans on the
homes and people of this community, was offered as an excuse for verbal and
physical attacks on young children.
We have been told that the violence was wrong but it was a product of a siege
mentality, of a community under attack, in decline, in retreat.
The arguments offered by unionist politicians from all parties not only
side-stepped the issue of the blockade on the children and their parents, but
actually created the space within which the blockade and indeed violence could
continue.
While unionist politicians have every right to raise and seek to debate the
broader social, political, economic and cultural conditions of life for all
sections of the community in north Belfast, doing so in an attempt to justify or
excuse attacks on young children is wrong. Furthermore it undermines their own
case and demonstrates to the world that they are indeed using school children as
bargaining chips and leverage in an attempt to seek the resolution of other
issues.
The one indisputable fact in all of this is that school children from Holy Cross
are not and cannot be seen as responsible for any issue of concern to residents
in Glenbryn.
The blockade is not some tit-for-tat sectarian dispute, involving two warring
communities.
This is about grown adults mounting a violent blockade against young children
and their parents.
There is no equivalence between what the children are experiencing and the
problems experienced by residents of Glenbryn. These are two separate matters.
Only those seeking to justify the blockade are mixing them together.
The blockade on Holy Cross primary school is wrong and must end.
All politicians must support this call.
There is no right to protest against children. There is no right to harass
children. Nor is there any right to use children as political hostages in
arguments about other political or economic issues.
2001 is the European Year of the Child.
The European Convention of Human Rights clearly places the rights of children
above any right to protest. The Holy Cross blockade is in breach of the European
Convention and is thus illegal.
It is now up to unionist and British politicians to recognise this legal fact
and to use their influence to end this unjustifiable blockade at Holy Cross
girls’ primary school.
I started to write this article before the horrendous attacks in America.
It is true to say that these attacks have affected every Irish person. People
could be forgiven for thinking that what is happening to the children of Holy
Cross is minuscule by comparison.
The American attacks cannot become a yardstick. Instead of the UDA/RHD trying to
de-escalate the situation, they have attempted to murder a Catholic taxi driver
and have threatened all other Catholic taxi drivers in north Belfast.
This makes the task of putting public pressure on the UDA to remove such death
threats to taxi drivers, parents and children all the more urgent.
We wait to hear the voices of the British government, and all the unionist and
loyalist public representatives, who have been ambivalent or silent up until
now.